Access to Health Care for Migrants Along the Mexico-United States Border: Applying a Framework to Assess Barriers to Care in Mexico

Background Migrants in Mexico are entitled to care at all levels, independently of their migration status. However, previous studies show that access to care is difficult for this population. As the movement of in-transit migrants and asylum seekers has been interrupted at the Mexico-United States border by migration policies such as the “Remain in Mexico” program, and by border closures due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Mexican health system has the challenge of providing them with health care. Levesque et al.'s framework, according to which access occurs at the interface of health system characteristics and potential users' abilities to interact with it, is a useful theoretical tool to analyze the barriers faced by migrants. Objective The objective of this article is to analyze the barriers to access the public Mexican health system, encountered by migrants in cities in Mexican states at the Mexico-United States border during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Data came from a multiple case study of the response of migrant shelters to health care needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. The study consisted of a non-probability survey of migrants with a recent health need, and interviews with persons working in civil society organizations providing services to migrants, governmental actors involved in the response to migration, and academics with expertise in the subject. We analyzed the quantitative and qualitative results according to Levesque et al.'s framework. Results 36/189 migrants surveyed had sought health care in a public service. The main limitations to access were in the availability and accommodation dimension (administrative barriers decreasing migrants' ability to reach the system), and the affordability dimension (out-of-pocket costs limiting migrants' ability to pay). Civil society organizations were a major source of social support, helping migrants overcome some of the barriers identified. Conclusions While Mexico's health regulations are inclusive of migrants, in practice there are major barriers to access public health services, which might inhibit migrants from seeking those services. In order to comply with its commitment to guarantee the right to health of all persons, the Mexican health authorities should address the implementation gap between an inclusive policy, and the barriers to access that still remain.

Migrant shelters' response to COVID-19: Comparative case study in four cities close to the Mexico-United States border.

Introduction: In the context of a health contingency such as the current COVID-19 pandemic, some groups may remain invisible, so that their health needs go unnoticed. These groups include migrants, asylum seekers, and refugees (MAR). In Mexico there is a network of migrant shelters (casas del migrante-CM) that provide humanitarian assistance, including access to heath care. Given the major role of the CM in caring for migrants, it was important to identify the main elements of their internal capacities, and of the external resources in the cities in which they are located, that contributed to their role in protecting MRA`s health during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: we use a comparative case study approach to understand, explain, and compare how internal capacities and external resources available to four CM in the north of Mexico, influenced the development and implementation of COVID-19 related strategies to protect MRA. The project took place during 2021 in Saltillo and Piedras Negras in Coahuila; Ciudad Juarez, Chihuahua, and in Monterrey, Nuevo Leon. A total of 18 in-depth interviews were performed with key actors from the CM, academia, health care services and international agencies. Results: We found a range from a total closure of one CM, to the continuation of operation of three of them, with differences in the strategies developed to provide services and avoid infections within the facilities. MARs' still face multiple barriers to exercise their right to health, and the response of local governments towards migration and health impacts the response that CM were able to implement. Conclusion: There is a need to strengthening the preparedness and response capacities and coordination mechanisms of local, state and federal authorities to attain their responsibilities in the provision of services directed to MAR, including access to health care.

In-Transit Migrants And Asylum Seekers: Inclusion Gaps In Mexico's COVID-19 Health Policy Response.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, as immigration and asylum processes were delayed or interrupted, migrants and asylum seekers were stranded at Mexico's northern border. In-transit migrants and asylum seekers are an underserved population, and pandemic preparedness has seldom taken their needs into account. In this article we analyze public health policies developed in Mexico in response to the COVID-19 pandemic and describe how these policies have largely overlooked the needs of vulnerable mobile populations. We reviewed eighty publicly available documents issued by federal, state, and municipal authorities in Mexico between January and September 2020. Only seven policy documents explicitly considered in-transit migrants and asylum seekers and their health care needs. In addition, we identified six major gaps in these policies that, if addressed, would promote greater inclusion of persons in mobility in future pandemic response plans, to protect the health of migrant populations.